Reading to Enhance Active Learning

Techniques and tools to enhance active learning through reading


Additional Reading Resources

  1. Alexander, P. A., & Fox, E. (2011). Adolescent reading. In M.L. Kamil, P. D. Pearson, E.B.
  2. Moje, & P. Afflerbach (Eds.), Handbook of reading research, Vol. IV (pp. 157-176). New York: Routledge.
  3. Alexander, P.A., Schallert, D.L., & Hare, V.C. (1991). Coming to terms: How researchers in learning and literacy talk about knowledge. Review of educational Research, 61(3) 315-343.
  4. Anderson, L. W. and Krathwohl, D. R., et al (Eds.) (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Allyn & Bacon. Boston, MA (Pearson Education Group)
  5. Bloome, D. & Egan-Robertson, A. (1993). The social construction of intertextuality and classroom reading and writing. Reading Research Quarterly, 28, 304-333.
  6. Brown, M. & Churchill, M. (2011, January 12). When Students Don’t Read. Chronicle of Higher Education. Blogs.
  7. Chambliss, M.J. (1995). Text cues and strategies successful readers use to construct the gist         of lengthy written arguments. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 778-807.
  8. Chapman, J. (1983). Reading development and cohesion. London, England: Henemann educational Books.
  9. Conley, D. T., Aspengren, K., Stout, O., & Veach, D. (2006). College Board Advanced Placement best practices course study report. Eugene, OR: Educational Policy Improvement Center.
  10. Conley, D. T. (2007). Redefining college readiness. Eugene, OR: Educational Policy Improvement Center.
  11. Drucker, M.J. (2003). What reading teachers should know about ESL learners The ReadingTeacher, 57, 22-29.
  12. Fang, Z. (2006). The language demands of science reading in middle school. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 491–520.
  13. Fang, Z (2004). Scientific literacy: A functional linguistic perspective. Science Education, 89(2), 335-347.
  14. Graesser, A.C., Milis, K.K., & Zwann, R.A. (1997). Discourse comprehension. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 163-189.
  15. Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1992, reprinted 1995). Beyond Modularity: A. Developmental Perspective on Cognitive Science. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press/Bradford.
  16. Keating, D.P. (1990). Adolescent thinking. In S.S. Feldman & G. R. Elliot (Eds.), At the Threshold: The developing adolescent (pp.54-89). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  17. Kintsch, W. & Rawson, K.A. Comprehension. In In M.J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp.209-226). Oxford, England: Blackwell Publishing. Moore P.J. & Sceval, J.J. (1997). Learning from texts and visual aids: A developmental perspective. Journal of Research in Reading, 20, 205-223.
  18. National Research Council. (2002). Learning and understanding: Improving advanced study of mathematics and science in U.S. High schools. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  19. Nippold, M.A., & Martin, S.T. (1989). Idiom Interpretation in isolation versus context; A developmental study with adolescents. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35, 108-118.
  20. Oakes, M. (1986). Statistical inference: A commentary for the social and behavioral sciences, Chichester, England: Wiley.
  21. Pearson, P. D., & Stephens, D. (1994). Learning about literacy: A 30-year journey. In R. B. Ruddell, M. R. Ruddell, & H. Singer (Eds.). Theoretical models and processes of reading (4th ed., pp. 22-42). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
  22. Peters, E., Västfjäll, D., Slovic, P., Mertz, C. K., Mazzocco, K., & Dickert, S. (2006). Numeracy and decision making. Psychological Science, 17, 407–413.
  23. Pressley, M. & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  24. RAND reading Study Group (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: RAND. Science and Technology Policy Institute.
  25. Richardson, J.S. & Morgan, R.F. (2002). Reading to Learn in the Content Areas. Belmont, CA:Wadsworth.
  26. Robinson, H. R. (1983). Teaching reading, writing, and study strategies: The content areas. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  27. Ryder, R.J. & Graves, M.F. (2003). Reading and Learning in Content Areas. Danvers, MA:Wiley.
  28. Schemo, D. J. (2006, August 9). It takes more than schools to close the gap. The New York Times.
  29. Shanahan T. & Shanahan C. (2008). Teaching Disciplinary Literacy to Adolescents: Rethinking Content- Area Literacy. Harvard Educational Review, 78, 40-59.
  30. Shanahan, C. (2009). Disciplinary comprehension. In S. Israel & G. Duffy (Eds.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension (pp. 240-260). New York & London: Routledge.
  31. Wade, S.E., & Moje E.B. (2000). The role of text in Reading. In M.L. Kamil, P.D. Pearson, E.B.
  32. Moje, P.P. Afflebach (Eds), Handbook of Reading Research (Vol 3, pp.609-627). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  33. Yagelski, R.P. (2001). Literacies and Technologies. New York, NY: Longman.
  34. Zygouris-Coe, V. (2012 July 24). Eyes on disciplinary literacy. International Literacy Association.